The first number on Twin Rivers Unified^↗ET was too broad.

On the authorizer-total line in California's chronic absenteeism data, Twin Rivers shows 24,528 chronically absent students out of 49,331 eligible students, or 49.7%. But that line blends the district's own schools with authorized charter schools. On the district-operated line, which excludes those authorized charters, Twin Rivers had 7,308 chronically absent students out of 24,033 eligible students in 2024-25. That is 30.4%.

The correction changes the story. Twin Rivers is not a district where half of the students in its own schools were chronically absent in 2024-25. It is a district where nearly one in three students in district-operated schools were chronically absent, still enough to rank seventh among California's 59 districts with at least 20,000 district-operated eligible students.

A crisis, not the old headline

The 30.4% rate is lower than the charter-blended figure, and lower than Twin Rivers' 2021-22 district-operated peak of 48.6%. It is also still 13.2 points higher than the district's 17.2% rate in 2018-19 and 10.9 points above the 2024-25 statewide district-operated rate of 19.5%.

The district-operated trend shows the pandemic spike and the incomplete recovery clearly: 17.2% in 2018-19, 48.6% in 2021-22, 35.8% in 2022-23, 31.7% in 2023-24, and 30.4% in 2024-25. The latest year was an improvement from the peak, but not a return to the pre-pandemic baseline.

That makes the frame narrower and more precise. The district's own schools are not at majority chronic absenteeism. They are still serving more than 7,300 chronically absent students in a single year.

The charter blend

California's absence files include both district-operated and authorizer-total views. In Twin Rivers, the distinction is unusually large. The 2024-25 authorizer-total line counts 49,331 eligible students and 24,528 chronically absent students. The district-operated line counts 24,033 eligible students and 7,308 chronically absent students. The authorized-charter line counts 25,421 eligible students and 17,284 chronically absent students, a 68.0% rate.

That is why the earlier 49.7% headline was not a clean measure of attendance in Twin Rivers' own schools. The district-operated number is the better basis for comparing the schools directly run by Twin Rivers to other districts' own schools.

Who is missing school

Chronic absenteeism means a student was absent for at least 10% of the days they were expected to attend, according to the California Department of Education's chronic absenteeism definition. On that measure, several Twin Rivers student groups remain far above the statewide overall rate.

Black students in Twin Rivers district-operated schools had a 44.4% chronic absenteeism rate in 2024-25. Students experiencing homelessness were at 39.4%. Students with disabilities were at 38.4%. Economically disadvantaged students were at 31.4%, Hispanic students at 31.0%, white students at 27.2%, English learners at 23.1%, and Asian students at 17.6%.

Those numbers do not support the old claim that every subgroup was above 20%. Asian students were below that threshold. But the subgroup table still shows a broad attendance problem, with the highest rates concentrated among Black students, students experiencing homelessness, and students with disabilities.

Still high in Sacramento County

Twin Rivers is not alone in Sacramento County, but it remains high on the district-operated basis.

Sacramento City Unified^↗ET was at 25.2% in 2024-25. San Juan Unified^↗ET was at 23.9%. Robla Elementary^↗ET was at 23.8%. Natomas Unified^↗ET was at 22.2%. Elk Grove Unified^↗ET was at 19.8%. Folsom-Cordova Unified^↗ET was at 12.1%.

Twin Rivers' 30.4% rate was 18.3 points higher than Folsom-Cordova's rate and 5.2 points higher than Sacramento City's rate. Among Sacramento County districts in the file, only Sacramento County Office of Education posted a higher district-operated rate, at 40.1%, on a much smaller 1,279-student eligible enrollment.

What the numbers can and cannot say

The data establish the size, trend, subgroup pattern, and peer ranking of the attendance problem. They do not explain the cause by themselves.

Suggestive context: California funds school districts in part through average daily attendance, so student absences can affect district revenue; the Legislative Analyst's Office describes attendance as part of California's school funding system in its school finance overview. That does not prove a fiscal mechanism inside Twin Rivers, but it explains why chronic absenteeism can matter beyond the academic disruption.

Unresourced: This article does not attribute Twin Rivers' attendance levels to a specific district policy, transportation pattern, housing condition, or intervention strategy. Those claims would require evidence outside the state absence file.

The defensible conclusion is simpler: when authorized charter schools are excluded, Twin Rivers' own schools are not at 49.7% chronic absenteeism. They are at 30.4%, still one of the highest large-district rates in California and still far above the district's pre-pandemic level.

Data source

Analysis based on chronic absenteeism data from the California Department of Education DataQuest downloadable files, school years 2016-17 through 2024-25.

# See: content/ca/2026-07-06-ca-twin-rivers-crisis-analysis.R