<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>San Bernardino City Unified - EdTribune CA - California Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for San Bernardino City Unified. Data-driven education journalism for California. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://ca.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>174 California Districts Hit All-Time High Graduation Rates in 2025</title><link>https://ca.edtribune.com/ca/2026-05-28-ca-districts-at-all-time-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://ca.edtribune.com/ca/2026-05-28-ca-districts-at-all-time-high/</guid><description>In 2025, 174 of California&apos;s 441 reporting districts recorded their highest graduation rate ever. That is nearly 40% of all districts hitting a ceiling they had never previously reached, in the same y...</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In 2025, 174 of California&apos;s 441 reporting districts recorded their highest graduation rate ever. That is nearly 40% of all districts hitting a ceiling they had never previously reached, in the same year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The number is even more striking against its opposite: only 37 districts posted an all-time low. For every district at its worst, nearly five were at their best.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ca/img/2026-05-28-ca-districts-at-all-time-high-status.png&quot; alt=&quot;More districts at all-time highs than lows, 2025&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The Scale&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not a story driven by tiny rural districts with 30-student cohorts. Among the districts at all-time highs are some of the state&apos;s largest:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/ca/districts/sweetwater-union-high&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Sweetwater Union High&lt;/a&gt;: 91.5% (6,655 students)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/ca/districts/chaffey-joint-union-high&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Chaffey Joint Union High&lt;/a&gt;: 91.8% (5,530 students)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/ca/districts/long-beach-unified&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Long Beach Unified&lt;/a&gt;: 87.4% (5,303 students)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/ca/districts/anaheim-union-high&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Anaheim Union High&lt;/a&gt;: 94.4% (4,846 students)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/ca/districts/fresno-unified&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Fresno Unified&lt;/a&gt;: 90.8% (4,430 students)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/ca/districts/san-bernardino-city-unified&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;San Bernardino City Unified&lt;/a&gt;: 93.5% (3,220 students)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ca/img/2026-05-28-ca-districts-at-all-time-high-largest.png&quot; alt=&quot;Largest districts at all-time high graduation rates, 2025&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are not affluent enclaves. Sweetwater sits along the U.S.-Mexico border. Chaffey serves the Inland Empire. San Bernardino City is one of the highest-poverty large districts in Southern California. Fresno anchors the Central Valley. The all-time-high club cuts across geography, demographics, and economics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The Distribution&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The median California district graduated at 93.2% in 2025. That means half of all districts are already above 93%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ca/img/2026-05-28-ca-districts-at-all-time-high-distribution.png&quot; alt=&quot;Distribution of district graduation rates, 2025&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The distribution is heavily left-skewed: most districts cluster above 85%, with a long tail stretching down below 70% that consists almost entirely of County Offices of Education (which serve at-risk populations like juvenile hall and continuation school students, making direct comparisons misleading).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The count of districts at or above 95% has been climbing too: from 110 in 2018 to 147 in 2025. California is reaching a point where a 95% graduation rate is typical rather than exceptional.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ca/img/2026-05-28-ca-districts-at-all-time-high-above95.png&quot; alt=&quot;Districts above 95% by year&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What It Means&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A district hitting an all-time high is not guaranteed to stay there. The 2024 data showed that statewide rates dipped after a post-COVID peak in 2022, suggesting that some pandemic-era flexibility may have temporarily inflated numbers. The 2025 recovery, with 69% of districts improving year over year, makes the case that the underlying trend is real.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still, &quot;all-time high&quot; in a data window of five years (2018, 2019, 2022, 2024, 2025) carries a caveat. California waived graduation reporting during 2020 and 2021, and the 2023 data is not in the current release. The records are being set against a limited baseline. A district that was at 94% in 2019, dipped to 91% in 2024, and rebounded to 94.5% in 2025 is technically at an all-time high, but the gain over seven years is modest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 37 districts at all-time lows deserve attention too. They include some County Offices of Education, but also traditional districts -- often small, rural, and under-resourced -- where the rising tide has not arrived.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The dominant story, though, is breadth. When four in ten districts are at their best-ever mark in the same year, and when those districts span the state&apos;s geography and demographics, the improvement is not random. Something systemic is working. Whether it is sustainable depends on whether the structural investments that coincided with the gains -- the Local Control Funding Formula, community schools, extended learning -- continue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item><item><title>Foster Youth Graduation Gap Is California&apos;s Widest at 19 Points</title><link>https://ca.edtribune.com/ca/2026-05-07-ca-foster-care-gap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://ca.edtribune.com/ca/2026-05-07-ca-foster-care-gap/</guid><description>California tracks graduation rates for fifteen student subgroups. In 2025, one gap is wider than any other: students in foster care graduate at 68.5%, a full 19.3 percentage points below the state ave...</description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;California tracks graduation rates for fifteen student subgroups. In 2025, one gap is wider than any other: students in foster care graduate at 68.5%, a full 19.3 percentage points below the state average of 87.8%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No other group comes close. Students with disabilities and students who are currently homeless each trail by 10.7 points. English learners trail by 8.1 points. The racial gaps that once dominated equity conversations (white-Black at 6.4 points, white-Hispanic at 2.1) are now fractions of the foster care gap.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ca/img/2026-05-07-ca-foster-care-gap-comparison.png&quot; alt=&quot;Foster care has the widest graduation gap of any subgroup&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The number translates directly to young people. Of the 5,649 students in foster care in California&apos;s 2025 graduation cohort, roughly 1,780 did not graduate. These are students already navigating the child welfare system, already dealing with instability that most of their peers cannot imagine. A missing diploma compounds every disadvantage that brought them into care in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Progress That Is Not Enough&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The foster care graduation rate has improved. In 2018, it stood at 59.0%, meaning more than four in ten students in foster care did not graduate. The 9.5-point gain to 68.5% is the third-largest improvement of any subgroup, behind only Black students (+10.5 points) and English learners (+8.8 points).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ca/img/2026-05-07-ca-foster-care-gap-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Foster care vs. state average graduation rate, 2018-2025&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the gap has not kept pace with statewide gains. In 2018, the foster care gap was 24.5 points. In 2025, it is 19.3 points. That is a meaningful narrowing, but the rate of closure has been uneven; the gap actually widened between 2019 and 2022 (from 21.8 to 23.3 points) before resuming its decline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ca/img/2026-05-07-ca-foster-care-gap-narrowing.png&quot; alt=&quot;Gap between foster care and state average graduation rate&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The trajectory suggests that whatever drove the improvement from 59% to 68.5% may not be sufficient to close the remaining distance. The last 19 points are the hardest. They represent the students facing the deepest instability.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A Cohort That Is Shrinking, Slowly&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California&apos;s graduation cohort of students in foster care has shrunk modestly: 6,651 students in 2018 to 5,649 in 2025, a decline of about 15%. Some skeptics might argue the improvement reflects compositional change, but a 9.5-point gain across a cohort that still numbers more than 5,600 students is not explained by selection effects alone. The numbers reflect a persistently large child welfare system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/ca/img/2026-05-07-ca-foster-care-gap-cohort.png&quot; alt=&quot;Foster youth cohort size, 2018-2025&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Where the Gap Hits Hardest&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the district level, the numbers are more sobering. Among districts with at least 50 students in foster care in their cohort, the Orange County Department of Education graduates just 50.0% and the Los Angeles County Office of Education 55.4%. These county offices serve the most transient students in foster care: those cycling through placements, attending continuation schools, entering and exiting juvenile facilities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/ca/districts/los-angeles-unified&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Los Angeles Unified&lt;/a&gt;, with 394 students in foster care in its 2025 cohort (the largest of any traditional district), graduates them at 74.6%. &lt;a href=&quot;/ca/districts/fresno-unified&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Fresno Unified&lt;/a&gt; at 78.0%. &lt;a href=&quot;/ca/districts/san-francisco-unified&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;San Francisco Unified&lt;/a&gt; at 78.8%. &lt;a href=&quot;/ca/districts/long-beach-unified&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Long Beach Unified&lt;/a&gt; at 81.0%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The range, from 50% at county offices to 84% at &lt;a href=&quot;/ca/districts/san-bernardino-city-unified&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;San Bernardino City Unified&lt;/a&gt;, shows that where a student in foster care lands matters enormously. Placement stability, school-of-origin rights, and designated liaisons for students in foster care vary widely across districts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The Funding Disconnect&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A 2025 WestEd report found that California districts spend only a fraction of one percent of their targeted funds directly on services for students in foster care. The state&apos;s Local Control Funding Formula generates supplemental and concentration grants based on counts of high-need students, including students in foster care. But because they are a tiny share of most districts&apos; enrollment, typically well under 1%, the funding generated on their behalf is often absorbed into broader programs rather than directed at their specific needs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The paradox is that students in foster care are among the most expensive students to serve well, requiring case management, transportation to school of origin, counseling, and academic intervention, and yet they are the least likely to receive dedicated resources.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What 68.5% Means&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A 68.5% graduation rate means that roughly one in three students in foster care in California leaves high school without a diploma. For a student who has already experienced family disruption, housing instability, and the trauma of the child welfare system, the absence of a diploma closes doors that were already narrowing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The improvement from 59% is real and meaningful. The remaining gap of 19.3 points is the distance between a system that has begun to pay attention and one that has solved the problem. California is clearly not in the second category yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>